Showing posts with label failure. Show all posts
Showing posts with label failure. Show all posts

Saturday, March 2, 2013

SOLSC #2 Just a game

Two Writing TeachersSlice of Life Story Challenge (SOLSC)

In recent weeks, I've been "nudging" the children to understand the concept of alliteration.  For me, this literary concept is one more way of getting them to notice the details of words – how words “work.

I created a simple set of picture cards with animal pictures, each animal's name having the same first letter as a student in the class.  I created a set of cards to "match" with these that have the students names themselves.  So - there is "Cheetah" and "Charlie," "Elephant" and "Ebony," "Rabbit" and "Reia," on and on.

At Gathering, I put these animal cards on their seat mats and created a whole new way for them to sit in a circle.  (It was a strategy for behavior management as well, as I purposefully placed certain first letter animals well away from others. )  The children walked around and around, trying to find the animal who matched their name, searching for their seat.  To be sure, some preschoolers were not understanding it entirely, and chose their favorite animal picture rather than one that matched.  We worked together to identify the "proper" pairing, animal and child.

Now we are playing "Concentration" with these picture cards during centers time.  This is "just a game" - and the children are delighted to play it with me - but I am learning so much about what the children know and how they think, how they approach learning.

I play with four children, using about a dozen cards – their four names and the four animals that are their alliteration match, with a couple extra cards added in for good measure. I lay the cards out face up, first, and we study them together.  Whose name is this? [Mine!] What is the first letter of this name? Holding up the name card,  I ask, Which animal is a first letter match with this name? When I am confident that the children know the basic gist of this game – every name has a matching first letter, then, I turn them over and mix them all around.

It  amazes me how much I learn from this very simple game.

Although not all the children can name the letters, all the children are reading their own names.  Most are reading the names of some or all of their classmates - wow!

There are so many different learning styles and learning approaches.  I watched them develop strategies "on the spot" to find the matches.  For example, one child, although unable to name the letter, has an extraordinary ability to visually match the shape of the letter to its twin - every single time!  Other children studied the turned over cards intensely, looking through the card at the marker that was bleeding through, to decipher the first letter of the word below. Still others showed keen spatial intelligence - remembering precisely the location of matching cards.

There is a whole lot of "juggling" when you play games with children, needing to be alert to their many different temperaments.  One child became totally frustrated when she couldn't find her own name.  She became even more frustrated when she got a match of another classmate and an animal, and she completely shut down - folding her arms across her chest and turning her back to us in disgust.  I made the decision, in the moment, to move on with the game with the other children, all the while patting her back gently, encouraging her to rejoin us.  Hmmm.  I will find time for personal conversations with her, at a time apart from the game itself.  Yes, we will try again.

I have considerable insight about their attention spans - some want to play the game over and over, others wander away when it is no longer their turn.  Children are learning to take turns, to wait for their turn, to be patient. I loved how the children helped one another...showing true generosity, sharing their recall of where the card was positioned, and helping their classmates find the matching card.

Yes, it is "just a game" - but what a lot of learning!


----


alliteration [əˌlɪtəˈreɪʃən]
n
(Literary & Literary Critical Terms) the use of the same consonant (consonantal alliteration) or of a vowel, not necessarily the same vowel (vocalic alliteration), at the beginning of each word or each stressed syllable in a line of verse, as in around the rock the ragged rascal ran

Collins English Dictionary – Complete and Unabridged © HarperCollins Publishers 1991, 1994, 1998, 2000, 2003


Friday, January 25, 2013

What about Humpty Dumpty?

We all know the nursery rhyme -


Humpty Dumpty 
Sat on a wall
Humpty Dumpty
had a great fall
All the king's horses and
All the king's men
Couldn't put Humpty together again.

Another awesome engineering opportunity for the Big Cats!!

Could we create something that would keep an egg from cracking, if it was dropped from a high wall?  

All children used recyclables and found materials for their devices.


We discussed how to keep the egg safe.  
Some children tried extra cushion or padding (a variety of packing materials, such as netting, bubble wrap, and styrofoam); 
others tried cardboard "roofs" and "walls," enclosing the egg; 
some simply crammed the egg into cardboard tubes; 
others went for size, using many, many pieces of recyclables to surround the egg; 
still others did a combination of these ideas.

Everyone created a device.

I placed a raw egg in the center of the engineering table to help the children "size" their devices as they built. 

"I've got to start again," said Jack, as he examined the size of the egg and 
realized it wouldn't fit in his device.  

Anya placed the egg inside her device and said "See, it hides right inside." 

Ellington reached for the egg to test it in his device, and 
was elated when it fit  - "Yeah, he does!"

The children were thinking like engineers.
How awesome is that?!

One preschooler burst into tears when she realized the egg wouldn't sit in her device at all.  I encouraged her to take a break, and we sat together, revisiting the chart about the engineering cycle - "See, if it doesn't work the first time, you try again...that's what engineers do."  A couple of minutes later, she was ready to try again - this time she was successful, creating a triangular device for the egg to sit in.
How awesome is that?!

[In the midst of all this building and creating, we had special visitors come into the classroom.  We are a demonstration school and we have scheduled visitors at least once a month.  Somehow, this is always a somewhat nerve-wracking experience for me, as I worry about how to attend to children and their many needs while looking polished, professional, and available to answer questions. Anyhow, a very busy engineering experience became a very busy engineering experience in a fishbowl!! Somehow, we  all made it, with mostly smiles on our faces.  The children were so engaged.]

When all the children had finished their devices, we tested them.  We gathered in the hallway, outside our classroom at a special test site.

The test site:
a makeshift high wall created from a large plastic storage bin on top of a high table.
At the base of the table,
an empty container,
to catch the device with the egg.

The children climbed up "high" on a step stool,
placing the raw egg into their device,
placing the device onto the edge of the bin at the edge of the table.
We sang the nursery rhyme over and over, as,
one by one,
the children used their hands to push their device off the bin,
letting the devices fall.

The children and I agreed beforehand -
if the raw egg broke as the device fell,
the device would be thrown away.

Children were riveted,
some had eyes covered, not bearing to watch
others had hands ready for clapping, cheering on
still others had hands clasped, wringing in trepidation and expectation,
all eyes on these tests.

Many, many devices "failed."
In fact, more than half the class created devices that did not pass the test.

There were a variety of faces on the children whose test resulted in broken eggs:

  • hands over eyes or mouth,
  • quivering lips and watering eyes,
  • quiet resolve.
This was a challenging problem.

This was the first time this school year that devices failed so frequently,
a difficult lesson for preschoolers -
going home with no device,
only a story to share with their families.

Was it too much for these little ones?
I don't think so.
Honestly,
there is safety in such numbers.

I nudged the children to very supportive responses at each failed test -

Whoa, what went wrong here?
What could we have done differently?
If we made this device again, what should we add that would protect the egg?
Why did [so and so]'s device keep the egg safe but this one did not?  
What is the difference between these?


I want to believe that engineering is a safe, friendly, happy way to learn about failure.
In a way, through these tests, we are celebrating making mistakes,
Oooh, that's a cool mistake!  
Did you see what happened there?


The children seemed to take the engineering process in stride,
seemed to understand that not every device would work.

How awesome is that?!


*****

I wrote an explanatory message to families in my daily note:

There is so, so much to be learned from failure - this is the best learning of all!
Ask your child:
What might you do to make the project work next time?What do you think went wrong?What changes could you engineer to fix the device?
Some families had a tricky time with this.  One Mom asked if her child would get a chance for a do-over the next day.  (Short answer - No. Long answer - We engineer devices regularly; your child has learned so much from today's test and will take this knowledge and apply it next time.)

How do we teach our children to persevere when we ourselves are so uncomfortable with failure? 
This is a dilemma.

I know at least one family took their child's successful device home and repeated the test with a raw egg from their own refrigerator - How awesome is that?!

*****

I have a marvelous class of budding engineers!

How awesome is that?!